Is it beneficial to group junior programs based on age spans of more than four years due to physical and social differences in children?

Grouping junior programs based on age spans of more than four years is not generally beneficial due to the significant physical and social differences that can arise during childhood. Children develop at different rates, and within a four-year span, their physical abilities, motor skills, emotional maturity, and social interactions can vary greatly.

When young players are grouped too broadly by age, it can result in disparities in skill levels and interactions, potentially making it difficult for younger or less developed children to keep up. Additionally, older children might dominate both physically and cognitively, which can discourage younger or less experienced participants.

Programs designed for more narrowly defined age groups can foster better learning environments where children can develop skills at a pace that's comfortable and appropriate for their developmental stage. By addressing these needs, instructors can create more effective teaching scenarios that promote positive experiences and engagement among all participants.